what’s in a name?

If you were to ask me to list all of the things I identify as — “black”, “woman”, “queer”, “writer”, etc., I think the word “feminist” would follow sometime after the word “tall”. “Feminist” is not an identifier I readily think of as something that defines me. This is not because I don’t believe in a movement that combats the subjugation and devaluing of women globally. Or because I’m not forced to face the devaluing of my own womanhood on a daily basis. I don’t even think it’s because of the history of feminism as a movement that centers the issues of middle-class straight white women, although that may be a contributing factor.

I think my disconnect from the word “feminism” is that it feels like it forces a singularity. I am “woman and”, rather than both of my identities of blackness and womanhood existing simultaneously. I think in a way, I have “chosen” blackness. This is because when I am around black people, I am black and a woman. When I step outside of my community, I feel like I have to choose. In the eyes of “women of color” I am a woman. In front of “white women”, I am black. It is only in black spaces that I feel like both of these identities can inform and live together, especially in the presence of other black women.  I identify more with the idea that I am a black person who is a woman, than a woman who is black.

That being said, I don’t see blackness as something above my womanhood. The spaces I seek out and participate in are those that center black womanhood. The relationships with women I prioritize are with other black women and femmes, not black men. If I were to identify as something relating to radical work to uplift women, I would identify as a “womanist”, like Alice Walker. In her words explaining womanism, she states that a womanist is someone who is: “A woman who loves other women, sexually and/or nonsexually. Appreciates and prefers women’s culture, women’s emotional flexibility … and women’s strength. … Committed to survival and wholeness of entire people”. Like Walker, I believe in black women’s, and women of color’s, socialization of being a site of care and healing as possessing profound tools to heal the world and ourselves.This is what i would also use for the radical women of the 1970s/80s.

Even so, I feel like my activism is something I live, not something I necessarily have to name. In that, I would identify as a black woman who prioritizes the healing and care of other black women. I don’t find that the naming of “feminism” makes others more visible to me. Instead, it makes those who carry the values and beliefs I do about radical healing invisible to me. The word “Feminist” groups us all together, making it unclear what we all stand for.

 

Comment ( 1 )

  1. Katie Lee
    Hi Kachi, thank you for sharing your thoughts on the prompt. I really appreciated how you interrogated the basis of the prompt itself, that being identification itself, especially as a feminist/activist. Your statement of "activism is something I live, not something I necessarily have to name" resonated with me, as I felt similarly while writing my own response. I also agree with your final critique of the word "feminist", which I think speaks to the core issue of identification (one that you explicate in this post); when we identify, we are understood as a group and our individual experiences/oppressions/privileges are overlooked, if not erased. I think this speaks to the second part of this prompt, which asks us to define the radical women of the 70's and 80's. I'm also glad you included Alice Walker's definition, since I wasn't sure what "womanist" meant :P I'm left wondering, though, if "womanist" captures the historic realities of the 70's and 80's, especially in contrast to our reality as womanists (or otherwise) today.

Leave a reply