Header Image - The Worlds of Ntozake Shange

Tag Archives

6 Articles

an impossible knot

My mother, pregnant with me in El Salto, a waterfall in Azua, Dominican Republic.

My mother, pregnant with me.

To be a daughter is to be inextricably intertwined with one’s mother, as explained by Adrienne Rich in “Of Woman Born,”. As I read through Rich’s logic of the all too complicated phenomenon that is the mother-daughter relationship, I came to understand my own relationship with my mother. Of course, there is only so much that can be taken from a text written by a woman whose relationship with her mother is not complicated by race or class. But nevertheless, I found myself thinking of the adolescent rage that inhabited my body as I thought of my mother. My mother is a woman born in the Dominican Republic, and having been dispossessed of her own mother as a child, she drew all of her energy into her relationship with her own children. My mother experienced the essential female tragedy, as described by Rich (237) and as a result, she nurtured us and provided a fierce, tender form of love that allowed us, allowed me to unashamedly desire this complete return to the mother. And yet, I experienced a similar distancing from the being that I am unavoidably tied to. 

I used to blame my mother for forcing me to stand in front of a sink and do dishes. She was unaware that the alienation from my brothers and what was expected of me made me believe I was somehow inferior, as if it to say that I was born with the purpose to serve. I hated her as she stood idly while I suffered the consequences of a rigid, patriarchal society that began in the confines of my home. And while I had not been introduced to the concept of feminism until my adolescence, I recognized the pillars of inequality, and saw her as the vessel of it. Yet, I did not understand the plight of motherhood. I did not understand the ways that my mother, too, had fallen victim to a system that rendered her a vehicle for oppression to her own daughter. I look at these images of my mother, pregnant with me, and understand Adrienne Rich as she describes the physical ties that envelop the mother and daughter. I rejected my own desire to return to my mother, but I imagine myself, enveloped in a warm, amniotic fluid that only meant to nourish me. I imagine myself, a mother to a daughter, whose own relationship to her mother is violently disrupted by her death. To make sense of my own plights, I needed to understand my mother’s, and the way she was limited, not only by the harsh expectations of a “male-controlled world,” but her inability to return to her own mother, aside from vignettes stored in her memory. I am still learning from her, of her, about her, and in doing so, I further tie myself to her. Yet, I don’t mind this impossible knot we’re creating.  

 

What’s in a name?

by Aissata Ba 1 Comment

Before even understanding the term, I already described myself as a feminist and I easily got upset when people misuse the term. A student from a class I took during my freshmen year stated ” I am not a feminist because feminism only creates a farther gender imbalance. I identify more as an equalist.” Not to invalidate her being an equalist, but I think she had a deep misunderstanding of what feminism is and aims for. For me, feminism was never about women overpowering men or stating “off with their heads,” but it was more about fixing the gap and creating an equal understanding that all humans deserve. Coming from a Senegalese family where patriarchy is still dominant, I had to learn about feminism independently. I have a very strong yet traditional mother who still holds the believes ingrained in gender roles. I have come to consider myself as a learning feminist because I am learning that different women want different things. There are women who want to remain in a patriarchal home and there are those who seek modern reinventions of gender differences and gender roles. Learning that as a form of feminism is where I am in my journey as a so called feminist.

I think there is a great misunderstanding of feminism and a great misuse of the term. For some reason, there are women activists who refused to identify with feminism though their ideas are similar in thought. The radical women who organized around feminist issues are still, to me at least, feminists as they sought to liberate women in whatever form that takes. The works of the women we have discussed mainly pays attention to feminism for women of color.  There is an obvious difference between white feminism and WOC feminism. I like to explain this difference by saying “white feminism concern equal pay but WOC feminism concern more with getting the job first before the equal pay.”

TBD on Feminist Affiliation

Before taking this class, my understanding of feminism was vague and mostly based on a white conception of feminism. Now as I am expanding my understanding of feminism, and different kinds of feminisms, and learning to look critically at the kind of feminism I was first introduced to, I find myself at the beginning of my development as feminist.

For now I am hesitant to identify myself specifically. As I am not a woman of color, I can recognize myself as an ally of WOC Feminist, Womanist, Asian/American feminist,  Latinx feminist etc but do not specifically identify with those groups. However, I certainly wouldn’t identify with the racist, exclusive, feminist groups that held (and still often hold) control of the public discourse over feminism. For now, this leads me to identify myself, not with a specific group, but with a role. For now I would identify as an ally to all my fellow feminists and a student of the various types of feminism. Each type of feminism is a practice of ideals, morals, beliefs etc. I must learn about and form my own practices before I appraise them and relegate myself to one or multiple groups.

 

I added this because I think this quote perfectly articulates the type of ideals I want to support, no matter what group I align myself with.

 

The more I read, the more I doubt

Every time that I read some text or work about history my most visceral response is this doesn’t make sense. The things that I am reading about, usually some ideological system implemented for the purpose of oppression (sexism, racism, queerphobia, etc) strikes me as being utterly illogical, irrational and unnecessary. Maybe I’m just too lazy and uncreative that I can’t fathom investing time and energy into making up ideas and forcing people to believe that just because. I say all this because that was my reaction when reading Becky Thompson’s work on Multirracial Feminism. She writes there is a widely held belief that “women of color feminists emerged in reaction to (and therefore later than) white feminism (338). This belief she attributes to hegemonic feminism telling a specific, narrow story about feminism. My response was there is enough evidence to effortlessly debunk this myth of a white, middle class feminist origin. Furthermore, common sense tells me that white people can’t do anything independently (I mean slavery) so why would I believe that white women could pioneer any liberation movement? Just makes no sense.

I have to constantly remind myself that people choose to not think practically. Hegemony functions within a collectively agreed upon state of impracticality. If you claim to want to free all women why wouldn’t you include all women? If you know that different feminisms coexisted why would you deliberately ignore those histories? I feel these are very basic questions. Most time I need to take breaks from reading discourse of any theoretical or historical nature because at the very foundation of it all is nonsense.

This text motivates me to learn more about feminisms of other cultures and time periods. I feel like there is so much about the social issues and activism of non black and non white women and non US women! Does that mean I am influenced by hegemonic feminism?

A key point I found in the text is that not only must the personal be political, but the political must also be personal (347). In the age of “I am (insert identities)” it’s easy to focus on what impacts you as an individual. However, freedom isn’t an individual state of being. Everyone must be free for freedom to be. Therefore, it’s necessary to think about another’s suffering and to ride for their causes as well. It’s just what makes sense.

A New Vision of Feminism

Like in our discussion two weeks ago on “dismantling the patriarchy” it is not possible without the influences of masculinity and how the dominant cultural forces of patriarchy. There is a continual challenge to include all identities in In the same way there is a challenge for our understanding of feminism to capture all identities, as feminism in my view is a localized experience. The fight for “equality” for women is not only racially or socioeconomically specific; but it is also grounded in one’s own experience through culture, ethnicity and personal encounter with their identity as a woman or as other. However, our readings highlight an important effort in the theory of feminism and how it is important to consider the intersectional influences and effects. Without an intersectional lens movements cannot fully fight oppression. Racism for women of color cannot be separated from their gendered oppression.

From an artistic lens, I think that Shange captures this challenge of intersectionality. Her work, and the works of many racially diverse feminist artist draw parallels of the plight of black women and people of color; yet they are able to capture the distinct and unique experience of black women and women of color. One modern artist that I appreciate is Mickalene Thomas. Her art is a process of revisiting and recreating art centered and focused on black women.

 

 

 

Feminism through “We Need a God Who Bleeds Now”

As a Women’s Studies major, I’ve been trained to conduct readings with a feminist lens in mind. Ntozake calls for a God who “bleeds” in her piece, “We Need a God Who Bleeds Now.” This was my favorite piece from her collection of poems entitled A Daughters Geography because it not only challenged traditional, male-oriented ideas about religion, but it pushed back against the historically negative perceptions surrounding menstruation. It suggests that bleeding is a sign of strength rather than weakness. In times past, menstruation was seen as shameful, in some cultures a reason to be sent away from the community, and on an everyday basis, a cause of anxiety and discomfort. Our contemporary climate is not entirely void of this conception, but it has since improved. However, Ntozake’s evocation of menstruation in her piece “We Need a God Who Bleeds Now” suggests that “that time of the month” should not be something shameful, but rather something to be idealized. She writes, “I am/ not wounded I am bleeding to life.” This line resonated with me because it opposes the idea that menstruation is a sign of “dying” within the body but rather, that it is an indication of fertility and femininity—not something that would be hated but rather an characteristic that we should want a God to emanate.

 

Similarly, to state that society needs a female God means that in this particular moment, there is nothing more crucial that to have a female leader. To specifically necessitate a female God rightfully challenges the dominant religious God, a Protestant and Christian religion deeply entrenched in hegemonic, masculine ideologies. I would also go so far as to say that this God is not strictly religious, but rather a governing figure over the world that we require. The message that this piece sends to readers is both powerful and brave.